Aktuell ist die Lage so, dass die USA die Freigabe für ihre Waffen NICHT erteilt haben, und – so die Aussagen – wohl auch nicht erteilen werden.
Y
Die USA haben bei den Freigaben für Storm Shadow / SCALP das entscheidende Wort, denn es ist US- Technik, die verbaut wurde – und damit sind die USA die Grundsatz- Entscheider.
Y
Die USA haben wohl eine Freigabe an UK und Frankreich erteilt, meint, sie stellen es beiden Ländern frei, „ihre“ Waffensysteme (mit US- Technik), im Rahmen der Ukraine, für Angriffe auf das russische Kernland freizugeben. <<< Ob diese Freigaben von UK+FRA bereits erfolgt sind, oder noch erfolgen werden, ist absolut unklar. Viele schreiben darüber, berichten von Quellen – aber in der Substanz weiß wohl keiner, was los ist – wie der Status in der Sachlage aktuell ist.
+++ +++ +++
Die Briten wollen die Freigabe nicht offiziell ankündigen – es scheint aber eine Freigabe zu geben (oder auch nicht?) – der Guardian berichtet:
There will be no press conference after Biden and Starmer meet today, and no announcement of any change to how Storm Shadow missiles can be used. “It’s being billed as a broad strategic discussion,” Dan Sabbagh said, shortly before joining a flight to Washington with Starmer and foreign secretary David Lammy. “It’s likely that the first explicit sign we’ll have of any change is a loud ‘bang’.”
The reticence about the change that now appears close to being signed off is one piece of evidence for how sensitive a subject this is. “Ukraine has been desperate for this to happen for a long time,” Dan said. “But the White House has been grappling with whether it’s an escalatory move. Make no mistake: what you’re talking about here is a change that could take the war to Russia in a meaningful way.”
Man beachte den Satz: “It’s likely that the first explicit sign we’ll have of any change is a loud ‘bang’.” <<< allerdings- man beachte dies auch – dieser Satz stammt vom Guardian- Journalisten Dan Sabbagh – sic! – nicht von einem Politiker.
Die Stellungnahme Putins im englisch übersetzten Wortlaut (Quelle: Kreml-Website):
Question: Over the past few days, we have been hearing statements at a very high level in the UK and the United States that the Kiev regime will be allowed to strike targets deep inside Russia using Western long-range weapons. Apparently, this decision is either about to be made, or has already been made, as far as we can see. This is actually quite extraordinary. Could you comment on what is going on?
President of Russia Vladimir Putin: What we are seeing is an attempt to substitute notions. Because this is not a question of whether the Kiev regime is allowed or not allowed to strike targets on Russian territory. It is already carrying out strikes using unmanned aerial vehicles and other means. But using Western-made long-range precision weapons is a completely different story.
The fact is that – I have mentioned this, and any expert, both in our country and in the West, will confirm this – the Ukrainian army is not capable of using cutting-edge high-precision long-range systems supplied by the West. They cannot do that. These weapons are impossible to employ without intelligence data from satellites which Ukraine does not have. This can only be done using the European Union’s satellites, or US satellites – in general, NATO satellites. This is the first point.
The second point – perhaps the most important, the key point even – is that only NATO military personnel can assign flight missions to these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this.
Therefore, it is not a question of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries become directly involved in the military conflict or not.
If this decision is made, it will mean nothing short of direct involvement – it will mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries are parties to the war in Ukraine. This will mean their direct involvement in the conflict, and it will clearly change the very essence, the very nature of the conflict dramatically.
This will mean that NATO countries – the United States and European countries – are at war with Russia. And if this is the case, then, bearing in mind the change in the essence of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions in response to the threats that will be posed to us.