Der britische Express berichtet (FPI empfiehlt den ganzen Artikel zu lesen):

While policymakers across Europe have argued that nuclear power stations can boost homegrown supplies of energy, they have failed to mention these plants require uranium to fuel them. 

This is the crux of the issue as Russia, and Russia-controlled Kazakhstan currently supplies 42 percent of all uranium for all reactors worldwide. And when compared with the gas crisis, the statistics look eerily similar.

With the EU relying on Russia for 20 percent of its uranium needed to fuel supplies if Russia decided to curtail uranium deliveries to the bloc, it may spark the same problem and trigger another energy crisis.

Prof Paul Dorfman, an Associate Fellow from the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at the University of Sussex told Express.co.uk: „The argument goes that nuclear provides a security of supply. In other words, ‚you don’t need to worry about Putin’s gas or the Middle East’s oil‘. But this point of view is hugely problematic. 

„There is no question that the whole business about the Russian invasion of Ukraine has turned the nuclear industry on its head. This whole idea of security of supply, that nuclear won’t leave us dependent on foreign problems is false. 

„Putin, Russia and Russia-controlled Kazakhstan supply 42 percent of all uranium of all reactors worldwide. 20 percent for the EU, 14 percent of the US and nearly 30 percent of their enrichment services.

„The UK is different. We get our uranium from Australia and Canada and we don’t rely on Russia so we are ok.“

FPI empfiehlt auch diesen Artikel zu lesen (die größten Uran-Erz-Förderländer weltweit).